Impact of Television
and other Media on Children’s Development
Summary
Marilyn B. Benoit,
M.D.
Definition of Media: Television, Computer
Games, Internet, Music Videos & Songs, Video Games.
The debate over nature vs. nurture
has come to an end with the research findings that show the undeniable influence
of environmental factors on development.� The environment has its most direct
influence through the turning on and turning off of genes. For example, DNA
with its prescription for a particular trait can be switched on to make messenger
proteins that then instruct our bodies to begin the process that results in
the expression of a biological process, e.g. in the case of anorexia when
the body is deprived of fat, though the genes are there for secondary sexual
maturation, the hormones are not produced to initiate that maturational process.
That is an example of the microenvironment of the individual’s physiology.
The other environments we must consider are the familial environment and the
macroenvironment of the cultural and societal contexts within which children
live.
The Decade of the Brain brought
us great advances. In fifty years we have gone from Erikson’s Childhood
and Society to the Institute of Medicine’s Neurons to Neighborhoods.
We now know that the brain has a dynamic relationship with its environment,
and that it continues to both influence how the person interacts with his
environment as that environment itself modifies the architecture of the brain.
This has led to the concepts of critical or sensitive periods and developmental
plasticity which refer to the brain’s ability to utilize the environment to
do some amount of restructuring, and that there are indeed critical periods
when essential brain infrastructure is laid down. For example, the early childhood
development research has demonstrated that active environmental stimulation
is necessary in the infant and preschool years in order to set the course
for optimal brain development, regardless of the inherited intelligence potential.�
The take home message here is that the environment matters.
Maria Montesorri and Piaget both
recognized the impact of environment on brain development. Montesorri spoke
about the environment as providing the building blocks for the “mental flesh”
of the brain. Piaget used the term schemata to refer to the internal representations
that are the brain’s recognition system that allows a child to relate to the
familiar and move to understanding the unfamiliar.� Neuroscience literature
describes� “neural networks” (essentially webs of interconnecting nerve fibers)
in the brain which really seems compatible with Piaget’s schemata. The neuroscience
mantra “neurons that fire together wire together” is one that helps us to
understand the concept of associative memory, and why it is that the more
sensory systems that are recruited in an activity the more reinforced the
memory for that event is. From the trauma literature we have learned that
painful events (both physically and psychologically) can result in memory
impairments and long lasting structural brain changes. Pleasurable events,
on the other hand, are more reinforced in the memory system. The environment
provides the stimulation through its content and context, accesses the brain
via the sensory systems, and learning and behavior are reinforced if the experience
is gratifying, and the more immediate and repetitive the gratification the
better.�
What personal skills do children need to enhance their functioning
in the society as we know it today? They need to have a sense of mastery and
competence. In order to achieve that they need most of all to acquire self-regulation.
By this I mean the ability to manage their mood states, their anxieties, their
impulsivity and their general behavior. They need to develop the capacity
to self soothe in the face of disappointment. They need to develop frustration
tolerance and manage delay of gratification. They need to develop a motivational
system that moves them in a prosocial direction and enhances adaptive functioning.
It’s what Daniel Goleman refers to as emotional intelligence. They are not
born with these skills. Regardless of their biological endowment, regardless
of their socioeconomic status and their racial or ethnic backgrounds, the
environment plays a significant role in their eventual outcomes.
So what does television and other media have to do with
children’s development? Everything! The electronic media industry which includes
television, videos, computers, and the internet have a major presence in our
children’s world in America. The extent
of their impact on any given child’s development will vary depending on a
variety of factors. These factors are the traits of individual child such
as temperament, resilience, psychological vulnerabilities, and overall developmental
level. The family context plays a significant role in how children will perceive,
interpret and respond to the media. It used to be that parents had the singular
role of being the protective barrier between the outside world and their children.
In the early days of television when a family had a single television and
the number of shows was limited, parents could still manage to control their
children’s exposure to what came into the home. The family’s own “baseline”
functioning sets the stage for how media are used within the family environment.
Are they used for education about life events or specific topics? Are they
used to minimize interaction between and among the family members? Do children
have their own entertainment centers in their bedrooms? The media ultimately
affect how children develop empathy, manage conflictual situations, attempt
to negotiate and compromise, their sensitivities to others, and how well they
embrace diversity in our human family.
These media have an impact on children’s learning, behavior,
their affective or feeling states, their physiological arousal, their expectations,
their motivation, their aggression, their choices as consumers, their interpersonal
relationships, their health status, their sleeping behaviors, their sexual
behavior, their drug, alcohol and tobacco use and on their prosocial vs antisocial
development. There is no doubt that television, computers, videos and the
internet have all contributed to dissemination of important information and
will continue to be all mainstream vehicles of communication for a while to
come, and, as with the print medium, they can all be used in negative ways.
As we have pornography in print so too it comes on TV, in videos and on the
internet. The difference is that we are operating in a culture where rapid
and global dissemination is possible, and in America in a free market
economy where the advertising industry dominates all forms of media with “direct
to consumer marketing.”�� In America children of all ages are less supervised, and the media industry has
resisted making any significant changes that would be protective of children
and youth.�
The multimedia environment of sight and sound, combined
with being sedentary for long periods of time while eating high fat, high
calorie, low nutritious foods and drinks which are pleasurable, creates a
powerful learning experience for our children. But are they learning what
we wish they would? Schools cannot compete with such an experience and I often
wonder if our children’s common complaint of being bored is not related to
the “entertainment factor” so everpresent in the media. I visited one child’s
school to observe him recently and I was overstimulated by all the visuals
in the classroom. The children meanwhile were working on their spelling using
computers where the words were speeding past them and they had to recognize
the correctly spelt word. I thought to myself that maybe it is now necessary
for this generation of children who are been raised on playstations and game
boys to have such tools for learning. I did question what effect the removal
of the teacher from the learning equation may have on other factors such as
the seeking of approval within an attachment relationship that emotionally
matters. Young children learn best within the context of a nurturing relationship
with a significant adult. Could we be imposing technology upon them too soon?
My grandniece recently started first grade. I asked her what she would be
learning in first grade and her rapid and spontaneous response was “technology.”
Obviously this was promoted as the highlight of the coming academic year!
Steve Toomey, a cartoonist, captured the lure of the internet with his cartoon
in which he portrayed a very young angry boy leaving the family dinner table
pouting and saying “Well, I will just go and talk to my chat room family!”
This presentation will address the issues mentioned and
invite discussion from the audience. Since Mexico is considered
a developing country, my challenge to the audience will be to think about
prevention interventions that can be initiated to minimize the potential negative
effects on Mexico’s children.